[PATCH 2/7] x86/mm/tlb: Restructure switch_mm_irqs_off()

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Tue Sep 25 2018 - 23:59:09 EST


Move some code that will be needed for the lazy -> !lazy state
transition when a lazy TLB CPU has gotten out of date.

No functional changes, since the if (real_prev == next) branch
always returns.

Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: efault@xxxxxx
Cc: kernel-team@xxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716190337.26133-4-riel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 61d0beb5796ab11f7f3bf38cb2eccc6579aaa70b)
---
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 54a5870190a6..1224f7fb1311 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
u16 prev_asid = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid);
unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
u64 next_tlb_gen;
+ bool need_flush;
+ u16 new_asid;

/*
* NB: The scheduler will call us with prev == next when switching
@@ -308,44 +310,44 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
/* Let nmi_uaccess_okay() know that we're changing CR3. */
this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm, LOADED_MM_SWITCHING);
barrier();
+ }

- if (need_flush) {
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[new_asid].ctx_id, next->context.ctx_id);
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[new_asid].tlb_gen, next_tlb_gen);
- load_new_mm_cr3(next->pgd, new_asid, true);
-
- /*
- * NB: This gets called via leave_mm() in the idle path
- * where RCU functions differently. Tracing normally
- * uses RCU, so we need to use the _rcuidle variant.
- *
- * (There is no good reason for this. The idle code should
- * be rearranged to call this before rcu_idle_enter().)
- */
- trace_tlb_flush_rcuidle(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
- } else {
- /* The new ASID is already up to date. */
- load_new_mm_cr3(next->pgd, new_asid, false);
-
- /* See above wrt _rcuidle. */
- trace_tlb_flush_rcuidle(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, 0);
- }
+ if (need_flush) {
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[new_asid].ctx_id, next->context.ctx_id);
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[new_asid].tlb_gen, next_tlb_gen);
+ load_new_mm_cr3(next->pgd, new_asid, true);

/*
- * Record last user mm's context id, so we can avoid
- * flushing branch buffer with IBPB if we switch back
- * to the same user.
+ * NB: This gets called via leave_mm() in the idle path
+ * where RCU functions differently. Tracing normally
+ * uses RCU, so we need to use the _rcuidle variant.
+ *
+ * (There is no good reason for this. The idle code should
+ * be rearranged to call this before rcu_idle_enter().)
*/
- if (next != &init_mm)
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_ctx_id, next->context.ctx_id);
-
- /* Make sure we write CR3 before loaded_mm. */
- barrier();
+ trace_tlb_flush_rcuidle(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
+ } else {
+ /* The new ASID is already up to date. */
+ load_new_mm_cr3(next->pgd, new_asid, false);

- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm, next);
- this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid, new_asid);
+ /* See above wrt _rcuidle. */
+ trace_tlb_flush_rcuidle(TLB_FLUSH_ON_TASK_SWITCH, 0);
}

+ /*
+ * Record last user mm's context id, so we can avoid
+ * flushing branch buffer with IBPB if we switch back
+ * to the same user.
+ */
+ if (next != &init_mm)
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.last_ctx_id, next->context.ctx_id);
+
+ /* Make sure we write CR3 before loaded_mm. */
+ barrier();
+
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm, next);
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid, new_asid);
+
load_mm_cr4(next);
switch_ldt(real_prev, next);
}
--
2.17.1