[PATCH 4.4 23/28] ext4: fix online resizing for bigalloc file systems with a 1k block size

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>

commit 5f8c10936fab2b69a487400f2872902e597dd320 upstream.

An online resize of a file system with the bigalloc feature enabled
and a 1k block size would be refused since ext4_resize_begin() did not
understand s_first_data_block is 0 for all bigalloc file systems, even
when the block size is 1k.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/ext4/resize.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 
 int ext4_resize_begin(struct super_block *sb)
 {
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ int ext4_resize_begin(struct super_block
          * because the user tools have no way of handling this.  Probably a
          * bad time to do it anyways.
          */
-	if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh->b_blocknr !=
+	if (EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_sbh->b_blocknr) !=
 	    le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_data_block)) {
 		ext4_warning(sb, "won't resize using backup superblock at %llu",
 			(unsigned long long)EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh->b_blocknr);