Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific dma memory pool

From: Wendy Liang
Date: Thu Sep 27 2018 - 16:19:07 EST

Next message: Shuah Khan: "Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/28] 4.4.159-stable review"
Previous message: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: "[PATCH] bcache: add separate workqueue for journal_write to avoid deadlock"
In reply to: Loic PALLARDY: "RE: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific dma memory pool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Loic,

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:22 PM Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Wendy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wendy Liang <sunnyliangjy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 7:17 PM
> > To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ohad Ben-Cohen
> > <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linux Kernel
> > Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Arnaud POULIQUEN
> > <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxx>; benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxx; Suman Anna
> > <s-anna@xxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with
> > specific dma memory pool
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 6:16 AM Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch creates a dedicated vdev subdevice for each vdev declared
> > > in firmware resource table and associates carveout named "vdev%dbuffer"
> > > (with %d vdev index in resource table) if any as dma coherent memory
> > pool.
> > >
> > > Then vdev subdevice is used as parent for virtio device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 35
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 42
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 +
> > > 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > index 4edc6f0..adcc66e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/idr.h>
> > > #include <linux/elf.h>
> > > #include <linux/crc32.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > > #include <linux/virtio_ids.h>
> > > #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> > > #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> > > @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static void rproc_disable_iommu(struct rproc
> > *rproc)
> > > iommu_domain_free(domain);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
> > > +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
> > > {
> > > /*
> > > * Return physical address according to virtual address location
> > > @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void
> > *cpu_addr)
> > > WARN_ON(!virt_addr_valid(cpu_addr));
> > > return virt_to_phys(cpu_addr);
> > > }
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa);
> > >
> > > /**
> > > * rproc_da_to_va() - lookup the kernel virtual address for a remoteproc
> > address
> > > @@ -423,6 +425,20 @@ static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct
> > rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > + * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev
> > > + *
> > > + * @dev: the subdevice's dev
> > > + */
> > > +static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev);
> > > +
> > > + of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> > > +
> > > + kfree(rvdev);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
> > > * @rproc: the remote processor
> > > * @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
> > > @@ -455,6 +471,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> > struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> > > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
> > > int i, ret;
> > > + char name[16];
> > >
> > > /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
> > > if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct
> > fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
> > > @@ -488,6 +505,18 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> > struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> > > rvdev->rproc = rproc;
> > > rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
> > >
> > > + /* Initialise vdev subdevice */
> > > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
> > > + rvdev->dev.parent = rproc->dev.parent;
> > > + rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release;
> > > + dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev-
> > >dev.parent), name);
> > > + dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev);
> > > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&rvdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > I tried the latest kernel, this function will not set the DMA coherent mask as
> > dma_supported() of the &rvdev->dev will return false.
> > As this is a device created at run time, should it be force to support DMA?
> > should it directly set the dma_coherent_mask?
>
> Thanks for pointing me this issue. I tested on top of 4.18-rc1 few months ago...
> Could you please give me kernel version on which you are testing the series?
> Is you platform 32bit or 64bit ?
> I'll rebase and check on my side.

I am testing with 4.19-rc4 on aarch64 platform.

Best Regards,
Wendy
>
> Regards,
> Loic
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto free_rvdev;
> > > +
> > > /* parse the vrings */
> > > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
> > > ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i);
> > > @@ -518,7 +547,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> > struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> > > for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> > > rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
> > > free_rvdev:
> > > - kfree(rvdev);
> > > + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -536,7 +565,7 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> > >
> > > rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
> > > list_del(&rvdev->node);
> > > - kfree(rvdev);
> > > + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > index f6cad24..bfeacfd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct dentry *rproc_create_trace_file(const char
> > *name, struct rproc *rproc,
> > > int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
> > >
> > > void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
> > > +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
> > > int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
> > >
> > > int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > > index de21f62..9ee63c0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > > @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
> > > * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > > */
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > > #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > > #include <linux/virtio.h>
> > > #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> > > @@ -315,10 +317,48 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device
> > *dev)
> > > int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
> > > {
> > > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> > > - struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev;
> > > struct virtio_device *vdev = &rvdev->vdev;
> > > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > + /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
> > > + mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev-
> > >index);
> > > + if (mem) {
> > > + phys_addr_t pa;
> > > +
> > > + if (mem->of_resm_idx != -1) {
> > > + struct device_node *np = rproc->dev.parent->of_node;
> > > +
> > > + /* Associate reserved memory to vdev device */
> > > + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np,
> > > + mem->of_resm_idx);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Can't associate reserved memory\n");
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > + if (mem->va) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "vdev %d buffer already mapped\n",
> > > + rvdev->index);
> > > + pa = rproc_va_to_pa(mem->va);
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* Use dma address as carveout no memmapped yet */
> > > + pa = (phys_addr_t)mem->dma;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Associate vdev buffer memory pool to vdev subdev */
> > > + ret = dmam_declare_coherent_memory(dev, pa,
> > > + mem->da,
> > > + mem->len,
> > > + DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to associate buffer\n");
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > vdev->id.device = id,
> > > vdev->config = &rproc_virtio_config_ops,
> > > vdev->dev.parent = dev;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > index 6b3a234..2921dd2 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > > @@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
> > > struct kref refcount;
> > >
> > > struct rproc_subdev subdev;
> > > + struct device dev;
> > >
> > > unsigned int id;
> > > struct list_head node;
> > > --
> > > 1.9.1
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc"
> > in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Next message: Shuah Khan: "Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/28] 4.4.159-stable review"
Previous message: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: "[PATCH] bcache: add separate workqueue for journal_write to avoid deadlock"
In reply to: Loic PALLARDY: "RE: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with specific dma memory pool"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]