Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] seccomp trap to userspace

From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2018 - 18:47:10 EST


Hi Kees,
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 at 00:35, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Tycho,
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 at 00:04, Tycho Andersen <tycho@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:57:40PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-opages) wrote:
> >> > Hi Tycho,
> >> >
> >> > On 09/27/2018 05:11 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >> > > Hi all,
> >> > >
> >> > > Here's v7 of the seccomp trap to userspace set. There are various minor
> >> > > changes and bug fixes, but two major changes:
> >> > >
> >> > > * We now pass fds to the tracee via an ioctl, and do it immediately when
> >> > > the ioctl is called. For this we needed some help from the vfs, so
> >> > > I've put the one patch in this series and cc'd fsdevel. This does have
> >> > > the advantage that the feature is now totally decoupled from the rest
> >> > > of the set, which is itself useful (thanks Andy!)
> >> > >
> >> > > * Instead of putting all of the notification related stuff into the
> >> > > struct seccomp_filter, it now lives in its own struct notification,
> >> > > which is pointed to by struct seccomp_filter. This will save a lot of
> >> > > memory (thanks Tyler!)
> >> >
> >> > Is there a documentation (man page) patch for this API change?
> >>
> >> Not yet, but once we decide on a final API I'll prepare one.
> >
> > Honestly, the production of such documentation should be part of the
> > evolution towards the final API...
> >
> > Documentation is not an afterthought. It's a tool for pushing you, the
> > developer (and others, your reviewers) to more deeply consider your
> > design.
>
> In Tycho's defense, he did write up documentation in Documentation/
> for the feature, so it won't be an afterthought. :)

So, I missed that... How do I find this Documentation/ ?

> But yes, there's
> no manpage delta yet.

But, really, there should be, as part of the ongoing evolution of the patch...

(Apologies, Tycho. It may be that I came across a bit harshly.)

Thanks,

Michael


--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/