Re: [PATCH 0/9] AHCI and SATA PHY support for BCM63138
From: Jens Axboe
Date: Sat Sep 29 2018 - 22:35:22 EST
On 9/29/18 2:56 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 03:41:23PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 09/25/2018 09:12 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 09/24/2018 11:19 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> On Friday 21 September 2018 12:49 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>> On 09/20/2018 12:16 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Kishon, Tejun,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series adds support for the SATA AHCI and PHY found on the
>>>>>> ARM-basd BCM63138 DSL SoCs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would probably make sense for patches 1-3 to go through Kishon's
>>>>>> tree, patches 4-7 through Tejun's tree, and I would be merging the last
>>>>>> two patches through the Broadcom ARM-SoC tree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know if this is not a workable plan, thank you very much!
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I had left patches with the incorrect subject, please
>>>>> disregard the following patches:
>>>>>
>>>>> [PATCH 2/9] phy: broadcom: allow PHY_BRCM_SATA driver to be built for
>>>>> DSL SoCs
>>>>> [PATCH 5/9] ata: sata_brcmstb: Allow optional reset controller to be used
>>>>> [PATCH 6/9] ata: ahci_brcmstb: Match 63138 compatible strings
>>>>>
>>>>> since they have incorrect/inconsistent titles, the other patches are
>>>>> fine though. Sorry about that.
>>>>
>>>> merged the first 3 patches to linux-phy tree.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot Kishon!
>>
>> Tejun, are you good with picking up patches 4-7 and I take the last two?
>> Can you make sure you pick up the ones that contain "ahci_brcm" in their
>> subject, I had incorrectly formatted them initially, sorry again about that.
>
> Jens is running the libata tree now. Jens?
I looked over them, but the series seems somewhat messed up. Can you
resend 4-7?
--
Jens Axboe