Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for controller debug logs.
From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date: Mon Oct 01 2018 - 15:48:27 EST
Hi Balakrishna,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 07:21:02PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> This patch will prevent error messages splashing on console.
>
> [ 78.426697] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL packet for unknown connection handle 3804
> [ 78.436682] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL packet for unknown connection handle 3804
> [ 78.446639] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL packet for unknown connection handle 3804
> [ 78.456596] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL packet for unknown connection handle 3804
>
> QCA wcn3990 will send the debug logs in the form of ACL packets.
> While decoding packet in qca_recv(), marking the received debug log
> packet as diagnostic packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Bandi <c-hbandi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> index d98ed0442201..a00910aaed54 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@
> /* susclk rate */
> #define SUSCLK_RATE_32KHZ 32768
>
> +/* Controller debug log header */
> +#define QCA_DEBUG_HDR_MSB 0xDC
> +#define QCA_DEBUG_HDR_LSB 0x2E
> +
> /* HCI_IBS transmit side sleep protocol states */
> enum tx_ibs_states {
> HCI_IBS_TX_ASLEEP,
> @@ -849,6 +853,20 @@ static int qca_ibs_wake_ack(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int qca_recv_acl_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + /* We receive debug logs from chip as an ACL packets.
> + * Instead of sending the data to ACL to decode the
> + * received data, we are pushing them to the above layers
> + * as a diagnostic packet.
> + */
> + if ((skb->len > 2) && (skb->data[0] == QCA_DEBUG_HDR_MSB) &&
> + (skb->data[1] == QCA_DEBUG_HDR_LSB))
> + return hci_recv_diag(hdev, skb);
> + else
> + return hci_recv_frame(hdev, skb);
nit: you could just do hci_recv_frame() after the if branch, instead
of doing it in 'else'. That would make it clearer at first sight that
the QCA debug packets are a special case and other packets normal
operation.
> +}
> +
> #define QCA_IBS_SLEEP_IND_EVENT \
> .type = HCI_IBS_SLEEP_IND, \
> .hlen = 0, \
> @@ -870,13 +888,20 @@ static int qca_ibs_wake_ack(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> .lsize = 0, \
> .maxlen = HCI_MAX_IBS_SIZE
>
> +#define QCA_RECV_ACL_DATA \
> + .type = HCI_ACLDATA_PKT, \
> + .hlen = HCI_ACL_HDR_SIZE, \
> + .loff = 2, \
> + .lsize = 2, \
> + .maxlen = HCI_MAX_FRAME_SIZE
Is there any actual advantage of adding this 'macro' instead of just
using H4_RECV_ACL, which is exactly the same?
> static const struct h4_recv_pkt qca_recv_pkts[] = {
> - { H4_RECV_ACL, .recv = hci_recv_frame },
> { H4_RECV_SCO, .recv = hci_recv_frame },
> { H4_RECV_EVENT, .recv = hci_recv_frame },
> { QCA_IBS_WAKE_IND_EVENT, .recv = qca_ibs_wake_ind },
> { QCA_IBS_WAKE_ACK_EVENT, .recv = qca_ibs_wake_ack },
> { QCA_IBS_SLEEP_IND_EVENT, .recv = qca_ibs_sleep_ind },
> + { QCA_RECV_ACL_DATA, .recv = qca_recv_acl_data },
> };
>
> static int qca_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const void *data, int count)