RE: [PATCH v2 0/5] soc/fsl/qbman: DPAA QBMan fixes and additions

[Madalin-cristian Bucur]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li Yang [mailto:leoyang.li@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 1:30 AM
> To: Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@xxxxxxx>; Claudiu Manoil
> <claudiu.manoil@xxxxxxx>; Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>; Scott
> Wood <oss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM
> ARCHITECTURE <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linuxppc-dev
> <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] soc/fsl/qbman: DPAA QBMan fixes and additions
> 
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:44 AM Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> 
> Applied 1-4 to for-next while waiting for clarification on 5/5.   And
> updated the prefix to "soc: fsl:" style to be aligned with arm-soc
> convention.  Please try to use that style in the future for soc/fsl
> patches.

Thank you, I've sent an email about the APIs.
I'm not sure we need to align the prefix to arm-soc as the soc/fsl does not
service only ARM but also PPC based SoCs and historically we've been using
the soc/* format.

Regards,
Madalin