[PATCH 4.9 52/94] nfsd: fix corrupted reply to badly ordered compound

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 5b7b15aee641904ae269be9846610a3950cbd64c ]

We're encoding a single op in the reply but leaving the number of ops
zero, so the reply makes no sense.

Somewhat academic as this isn't a case any real client will hit, though
in theory perhaps that could change in a future protocol extension.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1725,6 +1725,7 @@ nfsd4_proc_compound(struct svc_rqst *rqs
 	if (status) {
 		op = &args->ops[0];
 		op->status = status;
+		resp->opcnt = 1;
 		goto encode_op;
 	}