Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] tools, perf, script: Add --call-trace and --call-ret-trace

[leo . yan]

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:24:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 03:39:03PM +0800, leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx escreveu:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:19:44AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Seems to me, these two features are _NOT_ only benefit for intel_pt,
> > > > other hardware tracing (e.g. Arm CoreSight) can enable these features
> > > > as well.  This patch is to document only for intel_pt, later if we
> > > > enable this feature on Arm platform we need to change the doc;
> > > > alternatively we can use more general description for these two options
> > > > at the first place.  How about you think for this?
> > > 
> > > Likely it already works for CoreSight
> > 
> > I think Kim played with this patch series and he also pointed me for
> > this series.
> > 
> > > I specified intel_pt, because if we just say traces the users won't
> > > know what PMU to specify for record. Being too abstract is
> > > often not helpful.
> > > 
> > > If someone successfully tests it on CoreSight they could submit
> > > a patch to the documentation to add "or <coresightpmu>" to these
> > > two cases. That would make it then clear for those users too.
> > 
> > Okay, agree.
> > 
> > Actually I applied your patch series v6 on the perf latest core branch
> > and tested on Arm Juno board, I observed there have couple issues, one
> > is CoreSight trace data doesn't support timestamp so I need to use
> > '-F,-time' to workaround the command failure; another issue is now
> > CoreSight is absent to set sample flags so perf fails to resolve
> > symbols [1]; these two issues are only related with CoreSight decoder
> > and it's no matter with this patch, so I didn't mention in my previous
> > replying.
> 
> Could I take that as a Tested-by? I.e. you actually applied the patches,
> run it and saw that it works as advertised, right?

Yes, Arnaldo.  This is my testing tag:

Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>

> - Arnaldo
>  
> > I need a bit more time to work out more formal CoreSight fixing patches
> > and will send for reviewing (also will include one patch to clarifying
> > Arm Coresight support in doc as suggested).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Leo Yan
> > 
> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/builtin-script.c?h=perf/core#n1128