Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add counter freezing quirk for Goldmont

From: Liang, Kan
Date: Wed Oct 03 2018 - 10:15:42 EST




On 10/3/2018 9:55 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 10/3/2018 2:10 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
There is another variant of model/stepping micro code verification code in
intel_snb_pebs_broken(). Can we please make this table based and use a
common function? That's certainly not the last quirk we're going to have.

We already have a table based variant of ucode checking in
bad_spectre_microcode(). It's trivial enough to generalize that.


Sure, I will generalize the bad_spectre_microcode(), rename it to
is_bad_intel_microcode(), and move it to
arch\x86\kernel\cpu\microcode\intel.c.

I suggest: is_bad_microcode() and have it in cpu/microcode/core.c unless
you are claiming that bad microcode() is an intel only feature.


Yes, other platforms also have microcode issues.
To make it more generic, I think we also need to extend the struct sku_microcode to check vendor and family.
The "model" in struct x86_cpu_id is u16. I will also change "model" and "stepping" to u16.

struct sku_microcode {
u16 vendor;
u16 family;
u16 model;
u16 stepping;
u32 microcode;
};

Thanks,
Kan