Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8188eu: cleanup array declaration - style

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 22:43 +0200, Michael Straube wrote:
> Cleanup array declaration to clear two 'line over 80 characters'
> checkpatch warnings and improve readability.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
[]
> @@ -3836,24 +3836,20 @@ Following are the initialization functions for WiFi MLME
>  *****************************************************************************/
>  
>  static struct mlme_handler mlme_sta_tbl[] = {
> -	{WIFI_ASSOCREQ,		"OnAssocReq",	&OnAssocReq},
> -	{WIFI_ASSOCRSP,		"OnAssocRsp",	&OnAssocRsp},
> -	{WIFI_REASSOCREQ,	"OnReAssocReq",	&OnAssocReq},
> -	{WIFI_REASSOCRSP,	"OnReAssocRsp",	&OnAssocRsp},
> -	{WIFI_PROBEREQ,		"OnProbeReq",	&OnProbeReq},
> -	{WIFI_PROBERSP,		"OnProbeRsp",		&OnProbeRsp},
> -
> -	/*----------------------------------------------------------
> -					below 2 are reserved
> -	-----------------------------------------------------------*/
> -	{0,					"DoReserved",		&DoReserved},
> -	{0,					"DoReserved",		&DoReserved},
> -	{WIFI_BEACON,		"OnBeacon",		&OnBeacon},
> -	{WIFI_ATIM,			"OnATIM",		&OnAtim},
> -	{WIFI_DISASSOC,		"OnDisassoc",		&OnDisassoc},
> -	{WIFI_AUTH,			"OnAuth",		&OnAuthClient},
> -	{WIFI_DEAUTH,		"OnDeAuth",		&OnDeAuth},
> -	{WIFI_ACTION,		"OnAction",		&OnAction},
> +	{WIFI_ASSOCREQ,	  "OnAssocReq",	  &OnAssocReq},
> +	{WIFI_ASSOCRSP,	  "OnAssocRsp",	  &OnAssocRsp},
> +	{WIFI_REASSOCREQ, "OnReAssocReq", &OnAssocReq},
> +	{WIFI_REASSOCRSP, "OnReAssocRsp", &OnAssocRsp},
> +	{WIFI_PROBEREQ,	  "OnProbeReq",	  &OnProbeReq},
> +	{WIFI_PROBERSP,	  "OnProbeRsp",	  &OnProbeRsp},
> +	{0,		  "DoReserved",	  &DoReserved},
> +	{0,		  "DoReserved",	  &DoReserved},
> +	{WIFI_BEACON,	  "OnBeacon",	  &OnBeacon},
> +	{WIFI_ATIM,	  "OnATIM",	  &OnAtim},
> +	{WIFI_DISASSOC,	  "OnDisassoc",	  &OnDisassoc},
> +	{WIFI_AUTH,	  "OnAuth",	  &OnAuthClient},
> +	{WIFI_DEAUTH,	  "OnDeAuth",	  &OnDeAuth},
> +	{WIFI_ACTION,	  "OnAction",	  &OnAction},
>  };

Perhaps const here too, and as well, the struct
declaration could use const char * instead of char *