Re: [PATCH v4 14/19] LSM: Infrastructure management of the inode security

[Casey Schaufler]

On 10/3/2018 11:13 AM, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> + * lsm_early_inode - during initialization allocate a composite inode blob
>>> + * @inode: the inode that needs a blob
>>> + *
>>> + * Allocate the inode blob for all the modules if it's not already there
>>> + */
>>> +void lsm_early_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>> +{
>>> +       int rc;
>>> +
>>> +       if (inode == NULL)
>>> +               panic("%s: NULL inode.\n", __func__);
>>> +       if (inode->i_security != NULL)
>>> +               return;
>>> +       rc = lsm_inode_alloc(inode);
>>> +       if (rc)
>>> +               panic("%s: Early inode alloc failed.\n", __func__);
>>> +}
>> I'm still advising against using panic(), but I'll leave it up to James.
>>
> Calling panic() is not appropriate here. Perhaps if it was during 
> boot-time initialization of LSM infrastructure, but not on the fly.

Tetsuo's patch makes this an __init function. It's only for doing
init time stuff like root inode initialization during start-up.
If it fails the caller is going to have to panic. This came straight
out of the SELinux system initialization code. I could go back to
having each LSM do it's own panic, but that seems silly.

>
> Use a WARN_ONCE then propagate the error back and fail the operation.
>
>