[PATCH net-next 1/9] rxrpc: Use rxrpc_free_skb() rather than rxrpc_lose_skb()

[David Howells]

rxrpc_lose_skb() is now exactly the same as rxrpc_free_skb(), so remove it
and use the latter instead.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h |    1 -
 net/rxrpc/input.c       |    2 +-
 net/rxrpc/skbuff.c      |   15 ---------------
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index ef9554131434..9ba87e4d15c7 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -1095,7 +1095,6 @@ void rxrpc_new_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
 void rxrpc_see_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
 void rxrpc_get_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
 void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
-void rxrpc_lose_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
 void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head *);
 
 /*
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/input.c b/net/rxrpc/input.c
index 4b86b6be6c1f..5b2626929822 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/input.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/input.c
@@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ void rxrpc_data_ready(struct sock *udp_sk)
 		static int lose;
 		if ((lose++ & 7) == 7) {
 			trace_rxrpc_rx_lose(sp);
-			rxrpc_lose_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_rx_lost);
+			rxrpc_free_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_rx_lost);
 			return;
 		}
 	}
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c b/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
index b8985d01876a..913dca65cc65 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/skbuff.c
@@ -68,21 +68,6 @@ void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace op)
 	}
 }
 
-/*
- * Note the injected loss of a socket buffer.
- */
-void rxrpc_lose_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace op)
-{
-	const void *here = __builtin_return_address(0);
-	if (skb) {
-		int n;
-		CHECK_SLAB_OKAY(&skb->users);
-		n = atomic_dec_return(select_skb_count(op));
-		trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, op, refcount_read(&skb->users), n, here);
-		kfree_skb(skb);
-	}
-}
-
 /*
  * Clear a queue of socket buffers.
  */