Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mach-omap2: handle autoidle denial

[Tony Lindgren]

* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [181004 15:53]:
> On 04/10/18 18:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [181004 14:47]:
> > > On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > It seems we should just provide a generic interface for
> > > > clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll
> > > > be forever stuck with pdata callbacks it seems.
> > > 
> > > The TI clock driver is actually providing these APIs, so that should be
> > > fine. I don't think there is any use / need for pdata callbacks atm, it just
> > > happens hwmod core is calling these at the moment which might have confused
> > > you.
> > 
> > Hmm OK. So do we already have some way to deny autoidle for a
> > clock from ti-sysc.c driver without pdata callbacks?
> > 
> > Suman pointed out few days ago that for a reset driver to work
> > we must do clkdm_deny_idle() and clkdm_allow_idle() as the hwmod
> > code does. I gues that really just boils down to doing clk deny
> > idle and allow idle on the clockdomain clkctrl clock?
> 
> Clkdm handling is done via pdata callbacks, that is a separate topic from
> iclk autoidle. Iclk:s are effectively only for omap3, clkdm autoidle /
> deny_idle etc. are a generic mechanism that must be used on omap4+ if you
> want to prevent autoidle of certain domains/IPs.

OK thanks.

Tony