Am 04.10.2018 um 20:52 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 06:05:52PM +0800, Peng Hao wrote:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c:Was there any feedback on this patch ? The problem does affect us,
In function âgmc_v8_0_process_interruptâ:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c:1447:10:
warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@xxxxxxxxxx>
and we'll need a fix.
Well as discussed using "{ { 0 } }" is as wrong as using "{ 0 }".
We should either use only "{ }" or even better make nails with heads and
use memset().
Christian.
---I wondered if
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
index 9333109..55f4755 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
gmc_v8_0_set_fault_enable_default(adev, false);
if (printk_ratelimit()) {
- struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { 0 };
+ struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { {0} };
struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { };
would be better.
Thanks,
Guenter
amdgpu_vm_get_task_info(adev, entry->pasid, &task_info);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 72f8018..e8b78c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
}
if (printk_ratelimit()) {
- struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { 0 };
+ struct amdgpu_task_info task_info = { {0} };
amdgpu_vm_get_task_info(adev, entry->pasid, &task_info);