Re: [PATCH v3] spi: spi-ep93xx: Use dma_data_direction for ep93xx_spi_dma_{finish,prepare}
From: Nathan Chancellor
Date: Fri Oct 05 2018 - 16:46:27 EST
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:41:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Nathan,
> Thanks for your patience and continued support working towards an
> optimal solution to fix this warning. Some thoughts below.
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:29 PM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Clang warns when one enumerated type is implicitly converted to another.
> >
> > drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c:342:62: warning: implicit conversion from
> > enumeration type 'enum dma_transfer_direction' to different enumeration
> > type 'enum dma_data_direction' [-Wenum-conversion]
> > nents = dma_map_sg(chan->device->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
> > ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:428:58: note: expanded from macro
> > 'dma_map_sg'
> > #define dma_map_sg(d, s, n, r) dma_map_sg_attrs(d, s, n, r, 0)
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> > drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c:348:57: warning: implicit conversion from
> > enumeration type 'enum dma_transfer_direction' to different enumeration
> > type 'enum dma_data_direction' [-Wenum-conversion]
> > dma_unmap_sg(chan->device->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
> > ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:429:62: note: expanded from macro
> > 'dma_unmap_sg'
> > #define dma_unmap_sg(d, s, n, r) dma_unmap_sg_attrs(d, s, n, r, 0)
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> > drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c:377:56: warning: implicit conversion from
> > enumeration type 'enum dma_transfer_direction' to different enumeration
> > type 'enum dma_data_direction' [-Wenum-conversion]
> > dma_unmap_sg(chan->device->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
> > ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:429:62: note: expanded from macro
> > 'dma_unmap_sg'
> > #define dma_unmap_sg(d, s, n, r) dma_unmap_sg_attrs(d, s, n, r, 0)
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> > 3 warnings generated.
> >
> > dma_{,un}map_sg expect an enum of type dma_data_direction but this
> > driver uses dma_transfer_direction for everything. Convert the driver to
> > use dma_data_direction for these two functions.
> >
> > There are two places that strictly require an enum of type
> > dma_transfer_direction: the direction member in struct dma_slave_config
> > and the direction parameter in dmaengine_prep_slave_sg. To avoid using
> > an explicit cast, add a simple function, ep93xx_dma_data_to_trans_dir,
> > to safely map between the two types because they are not 1 to 1 in
> > meaning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> >
> > * Fix escaped hash symbols for '#define' lines (\# -> #)
> >
> > v2 -> v3:
> >
> > * Instead of changing the dir parameter in the prepare and finish
> > functions, convert the driver to use dma_data_direction for everywhere
> > that makes sense. Add a helper function to convert between the two
> > types as there is still a couple of locations that need a transfer
> > enum (and no such function exists). Alternatively, the function could
> > just convert from transfer -> data and be used in dma_{,un}map_sg and
> > the rest of the driver be left alone. Hopefully I understood what Mika
> > wanted!
> >
> > drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> > index f1526757aaf6..667da7964d63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> > @@ -246,6 +246,19 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
> > return -EINPROGRESS;
> > }
> >
> > +static enum dma_transfer_direction
> > +ep93xx_dma_data_to_trans_dir(enum dma_data_direction dir)
> > +{
> > + switch (dir) {
> > + case DMA_TO_DEVICE:
> > + return DMA_MEM_TO_DEV;
> > + case DMA_FROM_DEVICE:
> > + return DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;
> > + default:
> > + return DMA_TRANS_NONE;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare() - prepares a DMA transfer
> > * @master: SPI master
> > @@ -257,7 +270,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_read_write(struct spi_master *master)
> > */
> > static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> > ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
> > - enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
> > + enum dma_data_direction dir)
> > {
> > struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> > struct spi_transfer *xfer = master->cur_msg->state;
> > @@ -277,9 +290,9 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
> > buswidth = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE;
> >
> > memset(&conf, 0, sizeof(conf));
> > - conf.direction = dir;
> > + conf.direction = ep93xx_dma_data_to_trans_dir(dir);
> >
> > - if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
> > + if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
> > chan = espi->dma_rx;
> > buf = xfer->rx_buf;
> > sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
> > @@ -343,7 +356,9 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
> > if (!nents)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > - txd = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(chan, sgt->sgl, nents, dir, DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> > + txd = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(chan, sgt->sgl, nents,
> > + ep93xx_dma_data_to_trans_dir(dir),
>
> So we've already calculated this once already in this function, and
> the value of `dir` hasn't changed since. While the compiler might be
> able to optimize out this common sub expression (CSE or GVN I think
> are the compiler passes that could optimize this out), I think it
> would be better to guarantee that this precalculated value is always
> used by replacing the rematerialization of the value
> (`ep93xx_dma_data_to_trans_dir(dir)`) with `conf.direction`.
>
Hi Nick,
That's a good point, I will change that for v4 (I'll wait for Mika and
Hartley to chime in before sending it out).
Thanks for the review,
Nathan
> > + DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> > if (!txd) {
> > dma_unmap_sg(chan->device->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->nents, dir);
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > @@ -360,13 +375,13 @@ ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(struct spi_master *master,
> > * unmapped.
> > */
> > static void ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(struct spi_master *master,
> > - enum dma_transfer_direction dir)
> > + enum dma_data_direction dir)
> > {
> > struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> > struct dma_chan *chan;
> > struct sg_table *sgt;
> >
> > - if (dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
> > + if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
> > chan = espi->dma_rx;
> > sgt = &espi->rx_sgt;
> > } else {
> > @@ -381,8 +396,8 @@ static void ep93xx_spi_dma_callback(void *callback_param)
> > {
> > struct spi_master *master = callback_param;
> >
> > - ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
> > - ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> > + ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > + ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> >
> > spi_finalize_current_transfer(master);
> > }
> > @@ -392,15 +407,15 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_dma_transfer(struct spi_master *master)
> > struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> > struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *rxd, *txd;
> >
> > - rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> > + rxd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > if (IS_ERR(rxd)) {
> > dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA RX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(rxd));
> > return PTR_ERR(rxd);
> > }
> >
> > - txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
> > + txd = ep93xx_spi_dma_prepare(master, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > if (IS_ERR(txd)) {
> > - ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM);
> > + ep93xx_spi_dma_finish(master, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > dev_err(&master->dev, "DMA TX failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(txd));
> > return PTR_ERR(txd);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.19.0
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers