[PATCH net-next v7 00/28] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel

From: Jason A. Donenfeld
Date: Fri Oct 05 2018 - 22:57:35 EST


Changes v6->v7, along with who suggested it.
--------------------------------------------
- Account for big-endian 2^26 conversion in Poly1305.
- Account for big-endian NEON in Curve25519.
- Fix macros in big-endian AArch64 code so that this will actually run
there at all.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Prefer if (IS_ENABLED(...)) over ifdef mazes when
possible.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Call simd_relax() within any preempt-disabling glue
code every once in a while so as not to increase latency if folks
pass in super long buffers.
- [Andy Polyakov] Prefer compiler-defined architecture macros in
assembly code, which puts us in closer alignment with upstream
CRYPTOGAMS code, and is cleaner.
- [Andrew Lunn] Non-static symbols are prefixed with wg_ to avoid
polluting the global namespace.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Return a bool from simd_relax() indicating whether
or not we were rescheduled.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Reflect the proper simd conditions on arm.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Do not reorder lines in Kbuild files for the simd
asm-generic addition, since we don't want to cause merge conflicts.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] WARN() if the selftests fail in Zinc, since if this
is an initcall, it won't block module loading, so we want to be loud.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Document some interdependencies beside include
statements.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Remove HAVE_*_ARCH_IMPLEMENTATION in intermediate
commits.
- Add missing static statement to fpu init functions.
- Use union in chacha to access state words as a flat matrix, instead
of casting a struct to a u8 and hoping all goes well. Then, by passing
around that array as a struct for as long as possible, we can update
counter[0] instead of state[12] in the generic blocks, which makes it
clearer what's happening.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Remove __aligned(32) for chacha20_ctx since we no
longer use vmovdqa on x86, and the other implementations do not require
that kind of alignment either.
- Submit patch to ARM tree for adjusting RiscPC's cflags to be -march=armv3
so that we can build code that uses umull.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Allow CONFIG_ARM[64] to imply [!]CONFIG_64BIT, and use
zinc arch config variables consistently throughout.
- [Eric Biggers] Document rationale for the 2^26->2^64/32 conversion in
code comments.
- [Andrew Lunn] Convert all of remaining BUG_ON to WARN_ON.
- [Eric Biggers] Include the Z3 proof of 2^26 conversion correctness in
commit message for curosity of others (https://xn--4db.cc/ltPtHCKN/py).
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Show importing of Andy Polyakov's code always in a
separate commit for all architectures.
- [Herbert Xu] Make more clear what "old" and "new" columns refer to in
benchmarks.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Replace `bxeq lr` with `reteq lr` in ARM assembler to be
compatible with old ISAs via the macro in <asm/assembler.h>.
- [Eric Biggers] Account for multiple threads accessing the same tfm in the
port of the current crypto API to Zinc.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Do not allow WireGuard to be a built-in if IPv6 is a
module.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] As neat as it is to have `default m`, nothing else in
drivers/net has that, so we remove it, alas.
- [Ard Biesheuvel] Writeback the base register and reorder multiplications
in the NEON x25519 implementation.
- Try all combinations of different implementations in selftests, so that
potential bugs are more immediately unearthed.
- The selftest infrastructure now generally prefers IS_ENABLED(..) over
ifdefs, since the compiler is more than capable of trimming unused
functions and static variables.
- [Sultan Alsawaf] Self tests and SIMD glue code work with #include,
which lets the compiler optimize these. Previously these files were .h,
because they were included, but a simple grep of the kernel tree shows
259 other files that carry out this same pattern. Only they prefer to
instead name the files with a .c instead of a .h, so we now follow the
convention.

-----------------------------------------------------------

This patchset is available on git.kernel.org in this branch, where it may be
pulled directly for inclusion into net-next:

* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zx2c4/linux.git/log/?h=jd/wireguard

-----------------------------------------------------------

WireGuard is a secure network tunnel written especially for Linux, which
has faced around three years of serious development, deployment, and
scrutiny. It delivers excellent performance and is extremely easy to
use and configure. It has been designed with the primary goal of being
both easy to audit by virtue of being small and highly secure from a
cryptography and systems security perspective. WireGuard is used by some
massive companies pushing enormous amounts of traffic, and likely
already today you've consumed bytes that at some point transited through
a WireGuard tunnel. Even as an out-of-tree module, WireGuard has been
integrated into various userspace tools, Linux distributions, mobile
phones, and data centers. There are ports in several languages to
several operating systems, and even commercial hardware and services
sold integrating WireGuard. It is time, therefore, for WireGuard to be
properly integrated into Linux.

Ample information, including documentation, installation instructions,
and project details, is available at:

* https://www.wireguard.com/
* https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard.pdf

As it is currently an out-of-tree module, it lives in its own git repo
and has its own mailing list, and every commit for the module is tested
against every stable kernel since 3.10 on a variety of architectures
using an extensive test suite:

* https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zx2c4/WireGuard.git/
* https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
* https://www.wireguard.com/build-status/

The project has been broadly discussed at conferences, and was presented
to the Netdev developers in Seoul last November, where a paper was
released detailing some interesting aspects of the project. Dave asked
me after the talk if I would consider sending in a v1 "sooner rather
than later", hence this patchset. Zinc was presented at Kernel Recipes
in September, and a video is available online. Both Zinc and WireGuard
will be presented at the conference in Vancouver in November.

* https://www.wireguard.com/presentations/
* https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard-netdev22.pdf
* Zinc talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFhdln8aJ_U
* Netdev talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54orFwtQ1XY

The cryptography in the protocol itself has been formally verified by
several independent academic teams with positive results, and I know of
two additional efforts on their way to further corroborate those
findings. The version 1 protocol is "complete", and so the purpose of
this review is to assess the implementation of the protocol. However, it
still may be of interest to know that the thing you're reviewing uses a
protocol with various nice security properties:

* https://www.wireguard.com/formal-verification/

This patchset is divided into four segments. The first introduces a very
simple helper for working with the FPU state for the purposes of amortizing
SIMD operations. The second segment is a small collection of cryptographic
primitives, split up into several commits by primitive and by hardware. The
third shows usage of Zinc within the existing crypto API and as a replacement
to the existing crypto API. The last is WireGuard itself, presented as an
unintrusive and self-contained virtual network driver.

It is intended that this entire patch series enter the kernel through
DaveM's net-next tree. Subsequently, WireGuard patches will go through
DaveM's net-next tree, while Zinc patches will go through Greg KH's tree in
cases when an entire development cycle has no relationships with existing code
in crypto/; however, if there are any relationships with code in crypto/, then
pull requests will be sent to Herbert instead in case there are merge
conflicts.

Enjoy,
Jason