Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch

From: Jason A. Donenfeld
Date: Mon Oct 08 2018 - 12:06:21 EST

Next message: Willem de Bruijn: "Re: general protection fault in __handle_mm_fault"
Previous message: Zhu, Rex: "RE: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values to DC for smu7/8"
In reply to: Miguel Ojeda: "Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thanks for the clarification Joe. I'll adjust my codebase to roll with
checkpatch's conventions.

Next message: Willem de Bruijn: "Re: general protection fault in __handle_mm_fault"
Previous message: Zhu, Rex: "RE: [PATCH 4.18 222/235] drm/amd/pp: Send khz clock values to DC for smu7/8"
In reply to: Miguel Ojeda: "Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]