Re: [PATCH RFC] proc: Don't retain negative dentries

[Ahmad Fatoum]

Hello,

On 10/8/18 6:55 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> What the hell does that have to do with negative dentries anywhere???

It's possible that this needs fixing at another place. I don't know,
but this seems to work for me, that's why I prefixed with RFC.

> NAK.  Rationale makes no sense _and_ the patch has nothing to do
> with claimed rationale.

Please CC me when this gets fixed properly. I am curious. :-)


Cheers
Ahmad