[PATCH 4.4 106/113] xen/manage: dont complain about an empty value in control/sysrq node

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 87dffe86d406bee8782cac2db035acb9a28620a7 ]

When guest receives a sysrq request from the host it acknowledges it by
writing '\0' to control/sysrq xenstore node. This, however, make xenstore
watch fire again but xenbus_scanf() fails to parse empty value with "%c"
format string:

 sysrq: SysRq : Emergency Sync
 Emergency Sync complete
 xen:manage: Error -34 reading sysrq code in control/sysrq

Ignore -ERANGE the same way we already ignore -ENOENT, empty value in
control/sysrq is totally legal.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/xen/manage.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/xen/manage.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c
@@ -280,9 +280,11 @@ static void sysrq_handler(struct xenbus_
 		/*
 		 * The Xenstore watch fires directly after registering it and
 		 * after a suspend/resume cycle. So ENOENT is no error but
-		 * might happen in those cases.
+		 * might happen in those cases. ERANGE is observed when we get
+		 * an empty value (''), this happens when we acknowledge the
+		 * request by writing '\0' below.
 		 */
-		if (err != -ENOENT)
+		if (err != -ENOENT && err != -ERANGE)
 			pr_err("Error %d reading sysrq code in control/sysrq\n",
 			       err);
 		xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 1);