Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.18 24/58] Input: atakbd - fix Atari CapsLock behaviour

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:49:47PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:40:39AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 08:28:40PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:11:48PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > I think Greg's last estimate was that about 1/3 of the kernels in the
> > > > wild are custom based on a kernel.org stable kernel, which means that we
> > > > have no visibility as to what they do with the kernel. If you don't know
> > > > who your users are, how can you prioritize some subsystems over others?
> > > 
> > > The numbers I had was 75% of the images a major cloud provider was using
> > > was either a kernel.org stable kernel release, or Debian.  The remaining
> > > 25% was an "enterprise" kernel including CentOS.
> > > 
> > > Also note that all Android devices are now required to follow the stable
> > > kernel releases as well, so add a few more million to that number :)
> > > 
> > > That being said, for a well-maintained subsystem like Input, whose
> > > maintainer almost always marks patches for stable releases, having them
> > > picked up by the autobot is unusual.  Dmitry, if you want your subsytem
> > > to be excluded, just let Sasha know, other subsystems have been excluded
> > > at the maintainer's request, and that's fine.
> > 
> > I am hesitant to request to exclude input from autosel just yet, on an
> > account that I might miss something. But I would like autosel to acquire
> > more smarts and be less trigger happy. I think it would be for the best
> > for everyone.
> 
> Keep in mind that it learns based on your choices, so maybe in a while
> it will be a perfect fit :)
> 
> Maybe to make it easier, just reply with NAK on the patch(es) you don't
> want in the tree and I'll drop them.

OK, I will be doing it then. Should it be a certain string so you can
script or a free form?

> 
> I was discussing more about the general case and stable tree policy
> rather than drivers/input and AUTOSEL, and didn't mean to try and
> dictate what we'll take or not. Sorry!

Me too and I am not trying to be dismissive of your effort, I am just
trying to have discussion on the criteria that we should use for stable
candidates.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry