[PATCH 2/2] x86/percpu: Fix this_cpu_read()

[Peter Zijlstra]

Eric reported that a sequence count loop using this_cpu_read() got
optimized out. This is wrong, this_cpu_read() must imply READ_ONCE()
because the interface is IRQ-safe, therefore an interrupt can have
changed the per-cpu value.

Fixes: 59eaef78bfea ("x86/tsc: Remodel cyc2ns to use seqcount_latch()")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -185,22 +185,22 @@ do {									\
 	typeof(var) pfo_ret__;				\
 	switch (sizeof(var)) {				\
 	case 1:						\
-		asm(op "b "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"		\
+		asm volatile(op "b "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
 		    : "=q" (pfo_ret__)			\
 		    : "m" (var));			\
 		break;					\
 	case 2:						\
-		asm(op "w "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"		\
+		asm volatile(op "w "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
 		    : "=r" (pfo_ret__)			\
 		    : "m" (var));			\
 		break;					\
 	case 4:						\
-		asm(op "l "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"		\
+		asm volatile(op "l "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
 		    : "=r" (pfo_ret__)			\
 		    : "m" (var));			\
 		break;					\
 	case 8:						\
-		asm(op "q "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"		\
+		asm volatile(op "q "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
 		    : "=r" (pfo_ret__)			\
 		    : "m" (var));			\
 		break;					\