On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:12:11PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
On 11/10/2018 11:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:59:11AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
blk-mq tags are always per-host (which has actually caused problems for
ATA, which is now using its own per-device tags).
So, for example, if Scsi_host.can_queue = 2048 and Scsi_host.nr_hw_queues =
16, then rq tags are still in range [0, 2048) for that HBA, i.e. invariant
on queue count?
Yes, if can_queue is 2048 you will gets tags from 0..2047.
I should be clear about some things before discussing this further. Our
device has 16 hw queues. And each command we send to any queue in the device
must have a unique tag across all hw queues for that device, and should be
in the range [0, 2048) - it's called an IPTT. So Scsi_host.can_queue = 2048.
Could you describe a bit about IPTT?
Looks like the 16 hw queues are like reply queues in other drivers,
such as megara_sas, but given all the 16 reply queues share one tagset,
so the hw queue number has to be 1 from blk-mq's view.
However today we only expose a single queue to upper layer (for unrelated
LLDD error handling restriction). We hope to expose all 16 queues in future,
which is what I meant by "enabling SCSI MQ in the driver". However, with
6/7, this creates a problem, below.
If the tag of each request from all hw queues has to be unique, you
can't expose all 16 queues.
IFF you device needs different tags for different queues it can use
the blk_mq_unique_tag heper to generate unique global tag.
So this helper can't help, as fundamentially the issue is "the tag field in
struct request is unique per hardware queue but not all all hw queues".
Indeed blk_mq_unique_tag() does give a unique global tag, but cannot be used
for the IPTT.
OTOH, We could expose 16 queues to upper layer, and drop 6/7, but we found
it performs worse.
We discussed this issue before, but not found a good solution yet for
exposing multiple hw queues to blk-mq.
However, we still get good performance in case of none scheduler by the
following patches:
8824f62246be blk-mq: fail the request in case issue failure
6ce3dd6eec11 blk-mq: issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case of 'none'
Thanks,
Ming
.