Re: [PATCH security-next v5 00/30] LSM: Explict ordering
From: Jordan Glover
Date: Thu Oct 11 2018 - 19:54:01 EST
âââââââ Original Message âââââââ
On Friday, October 12, 2018 1:09 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We've had things sort of like this proposed, but if you can convince
> James and others, I'm all for it. I think the standing objection from
> James and John about this is that the results of booting with
> "lsm=something" ends up depending on CONFIG_LSM= for that distro. So
> you end up with different behaviors instead of a consistent behavior
> across all distros.
>
Ok, I'll try :)
The final lsm string contains two parts: Kconfig "CONFIG_LSM=" and boot
param "lsm=". Changing even only one of those parts also changes the
final string.
In case of distros, it's the "CONFIG_LSM=" which changes. Even when "lsm="
stays constant, the behavior will be different, example:
Distro A has: CONFIG_LSM=loadpin,integrity,selinux
Distro B has CONFIG_LSM=yama,loadpin,integrity,selinux
User on distro A wants to enable apparmor with:
lsm=loadpin,integrity,apparmor
which they do and add it to howto on wiki.
User on distro B want to enable apparmor, they found info on some wiki and do:
lsm=loadpin,integrity,apparmor
Puff, yama got disabled!
Above example shows why I think "consistent behavior across all distros"
argument for current approach is flawed - because distros aren't
consistent. In my proposition the user will just use "lsm=apparmor" and
it will consistently enable apparmor on all distros which is what they
really wanted, but all pre-existing differences across distros will
remain unchanged.
The current approach requires that everyone who dares to touch "lsm="
knows about existence of all lsm, their enabled/disabled status on
target distro and their order. I doubt there are many people other
than recipients of this mail who fit for the above.
I it's better to assume that average user has rather vague knowledge
about lsm and don't delve deep into Kconfig's of their chosen distro.
If they want to use "lsm=" their goal is to disable/enable on or more
things. My proposition will work better for those. More advanced users
still will may pass any "lsm=" string as they like, this having full
control.
Jordan