Hi,Done
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 11:29 PM Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+static struct ufs_ref_clk ufs_ref_clk_freqs[] = {Please don't specify inline. Let the compiler decide whether inline is better.
+ {19200000, REF_CLK_FREQ_19_2_MHZ},
+ {26000000, REF_CLK_FREQ_26_MHZ},
+ {38400000, REF_CLK_FREQ_38_4_MHZ},
+ {52000000, REF_CLK_FREQ_52_MHZ},
+ {0, REF_CLK_FREQ_INVAL},
+};
+
+static inline enum ufs_ref_clk_freq
Will update.
+ufs_get_bref_clk_from_hz(u32 freq)I think you'll have less confusion if you write the above as this (untested):
+{
+ int i = 0;
+
+ while (ufs_ref_clk_freqs[i].freq_hz != freq) {
+ if (!ufs_ref_clk_freqs[i].freq_hz)
+ return REF_CLK_FREQ_INVAL;
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ return ufs_ref_clk_freqs[i].val;
for (i = 0; ufs_ref_clk_freqs[i].freq_hz; i++) {
if (ufs_ref_clk_freqs[i].freq_hz == freq)
return ufs_ref_clk_freqs[i].val;
}
return REF_CLK_FREQ_INVAL;
Now it looks like a normal iteration till a normal stop condition
(NULL term array).
We need not return error if no specific device ref clk was found via DT parsing. Device reference clock will be already set(bRefClkFreq MDV : 26MHz).+void ufshcd_parse_dev_ref_clk_freq(struct ufs_hba *hba)Shouldn't this return an error code so that if there's a problem it
can return back to the caller? Right now you print error messages but
ufshcd_pltfrm_init() will plow merrily along after.
Will update.
+{"freq" should be "unsigned long" to match clk_get_rate(), not u32.
+ struct device *dev = hba->dev;
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ struct clk *refclk = NULL;
+ u32 freq = 0;
Similarly all the places you pass it to and store it in should be
"unsigned long" too. Save "u32" for values which are being programmed
into 32-bit hardware registers.
Will update.+ if (!np)You don't need to check for (!np). If you do clk_get() and there's no
+ return;
np you'll get get an error back. Handle it there.
Explicit setting of device reference clock is not mandatory. It will be already set (MDV: 26Hz).+I can't quickly tell. Are you intending "ref_clk" to be optional or
+ refclk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "ref_clk");
+ if (!refclk)
+ return;
required? You check against "NULL" and return with no error message,
so I'm kinda assuming it's optional. ...but:
1. of_clk_get_by_name() doesn't return NULL when the clock wasn'tWill add comment to clarify that dev_ref_clk_freq is default set as REF_CLK_FREQ_INVA.
specified. It returns "-ENOENT". That means that (right now) anyone
who doesn't specify a "ref_clk" will get a crash when you try calling
clk_get_rate() on the error-code-clk.
2. It seems like it would be good to add a comment that
"dev_ref_clk_freq" was already initted to "REF_CLK_FREQ_INVAL in
ufshcd_alloc_host() to make it obvious how people are working that
didn't specify "ref_clk".
Will check and add required documentation.
One note is that regardless of whether "ref_clk" is optional or
required, something about "ref_clk" should be mentioned in
"Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufshcd-pltfrm.txt" so people
know that's an important clock name.
Yet another note here is that I'm confused why you'd want to useWill update.
of_clk_get_by_name(). Why not use clk_get()? You've already got the
"dev" node and clk_get() should be preferred since not everyone uses
device tree.
Will consider above suggestion and update.
OK, one last note is that clk_get() could return -EPROBE_DEFER. In
such a case you need to basically cancel your whole probe and
propagate the -EPROBE_DEFER. Make sure you think about that when
you're coding things up.
OK, I lied about the previous one being the last note. Why don't you
just add a bit of code in the ufshcd_init_clocks() loop. If you
notice that the clock name is "ref_clk" (similar to how
__ufshcd_setup_clocks() checks) then you can grab the frequency. Then
you can avoid dealing with all my comments above about
of_clk_get_by_name() and errors and -EPROBE_DEFER...
will remove __func__ .+ freq = clk_get_rate(refclk);nit: including "__func__" in dev_xxx() calls is discouraged. The
+
+ hba->dev_ref_clk_freq =
+ ufs_get_bref_clk_from_hz(freq);
+
+ if (hba->dev_ref_clk_freq == REF_CLK_FREQ_INVAL)
+ dev_err(hba->dev,
+ "%s: invalid ref_clk setting = %d\n",
+ __func__, freq);
"dev_xxx" calls already print the device name and the string within a
given device driver should be unique enough so __func__ just adds crap
to the logs. If you really feel that __func__ adds something for you,
try posting up a patch to make all "dev_err" functions include
__func__. ...but I think you'd probably be rejected.
ufshcd_set_dev_ref_clk() is only called if (dev_ref_clk_freq != REF_CLK_FREQ_INVAL).
Also (more important): You're missing a clk_put(). Thus you're
leaking a reference to "ref_clk".
+}Ugh, this is ugly. hba->dev_ref_clk_freq could be -1 but you're
+
+static int ufshcd_set_dev_ref_clk(struct ufs_hba *hba)
+{
+ int err, ref_clk = -1;
+ u32 freq = hba->dev_ref_clk_freq;
jamming it into a u32 here. That doesn't seem so ideal. Are you sure
-1 was the best choice for REF_CLK_FREQ_INVAL?
done
+It's not so wonderful to be passing a pointer to an "int" to a
+ err = ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_READ_ATTR,
+ QUERY_ATTR_IDN_REF_CLK_FREQ, 0, 0, &ref_clk);
function expecting a pointer to a "u32". Change "ref_clk" to "u32".
Will remove __func__
+Again, no __func__.
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed reading bRefClkFreq. err = %d\n",
+ __func__, err);
Will update+ goto out;nit: you already cached "hba->dev_ref_clk_freq in "freq". Use it.
+ }
+
+ if (ref_clk == hba->dev_ref_clk_freq)
Will remove __func__
+ goto out; /* nothing to update */Again, no __func__.
+
+ err = ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR,
+ QUERY_ATTR_IDN_REF_CLK_FREQ, 0, 0, &freq);
+
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: bRefClkFreq setting to %u Hz failed\n",
+ __func__, ufs_ref_clk_freqs[freq].freq_hz);
Will remove __func__+ goto out;Again, no __func__.
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: bRefClkFreq setting to %u Hz succeeded\n",
+ __func__, ufs_ref_clk_freqs[freq].freq_hz);