Re: [PATCH] signal: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
From: Kees Cook
Date: Mon Oct 15 2018 - 17:29:55 EST
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yes, please. :) I love every step closer we get to being able to use
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Kees
> ---
> include/linux/signal.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h
> index 200ed96..f428e86 100644
> --- a/include/linux/signal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/signal.h
> @@ -129,9 +129,11 @@ static inline void name(sigset_t *r, const sigset_t *a, const sigset_t *b) \
> b3 = b->sig[3]; b2 = b->sig[2]; \
> r->sig[3] = op(a3, b3); \
> r->sig[2] = op(a2, b2); \
> + /* fall through */ \
> case 2: \
> a1 = a->sig[1]; b1 = b->sig[1]; \
> r->sig[1] = op(a1, b1); \
> + /* fall through */ \
> case 1: \
> a0 = a->sig[0]; b0 = b->sig[0]; \
> r->sig[0] = op(a0, b0); \
> @@ -161,7 +163,9 @@ static inline void name(sigset_t *set) \
> switch (_NSIG_WORDS) { \
> case 4: set->sig[3] = op(set->sig[3]); \
> set->sig[2] = op(set->sig[2]); \
> + /* fall through */ \
> case 2: set->sig[1] = op(set->sig[1]); \
> + /* fall through */ \
> case 1: set->sig[0] = op(set->sig[0]); \
> break; \
> default: \
> @@ -182,6 +186,7 @@ static inline void sigemptyset(sigset_t *set)
> memset(set, 0, sizeof(sigset_t));
> break;
> case 2: set->sig[1] = 0;
> + /* fall through */
> case 1: set->sig[0] = 0;
> break;
> }
> @@ -194,6 +199,7 @@ static inline void sigfillset(sigset_t *set)
> memset(set, -1, sizeof(sigset_t));
> break;
> case 2: set->sig[1] = -1;
> + /* fall through */
> case 1: set->sig[0] = -1;
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security