Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 15

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:24:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:12:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:26:37 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > ALl ppc qemu tests (including big endian pseries) also generate a warning.
> > > 
> > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/memblock.c:1301 .memblock_alloc_range_nid+0x20/0x68
> 
> That is:
> 
> static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size,
>                                         phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start,
>                                         phys_addr_t end, int nid,
>                                         enum memblock_flags flags)
> {
>        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!align))
>                 align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> 
> Looks like patch
> 
>   "memblock: stop using implicit alignment to SMP_CACHE_BYTES"
> 
> missed some places ...

To be expected, I guess.  I'm pretty relaxed about this ;) Let's do
another sweep in a week or so, after which we'll have a couple of
months to mop up any leftovers.