[PATCH 4.18 053/135] net/mlx5: Check for SQ and not RQ state when modifying hairpin SQ

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 6b359d5550a1ae7a1269c9dc1dd73dfdc4d6fe58 ]

When modifying hairpin SQ, instead of checking if the next state equals
to MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY, we compare it against the MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY enum
value.

The code worked since both of MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY and MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY
have the same value today.

This patch fixes this issue.

Fixes: 18e568c390c6 ("net/mlx5: Hairpin pair core object setup")
Change-Id: I6758aa7b4bd137966ae28206b70648c5bc223b46
Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int mlx5_hairpin_modify_sq(struct
 
 	sqc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(modify_sq_in, in, ctx);
 
-	if (next_state == MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY) {
+	if (next_state == MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY) {
 		MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_rq, peer_rq);
 		MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_vhca, peer_vhca);
 	}