Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories

[Boris Brezillon]

On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:20:19 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Tudor,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tudor Ambarus [mailto:tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:31 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>; Boris Brezillon
> > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx>; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx;
> > dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; richard@xxxxxx;
> > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cristian.Birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI
> > NOR flash memories
> > 
> > Hi, Yogesh,
> > 
> > On 10/17/2018 10:46 AM, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote:  
> > > Hi Boris,
> > >  
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM
> > >> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>
> > >> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tudor Ambarus
> > >> <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx;
> > >> dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; richard@xxxxxx;
> > >> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > >> cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > >> linux-arm- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cristian.Birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform
> > >> SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200
> > >> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>  
> > >>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200
> > >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>  
> > >>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000
> > >>>> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>>  
> > >>>>>>  
> > >>>>> Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file.
> > >>>>> For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I
> > >>>>> have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected
> > >>>>> flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also
> > >>>>> points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s",
> > >>>>> INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256
> > >>>>> * 1024, 256, ....}
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1
> > >>>>> protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are
> > >>>>> wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is
> > >>>>> being send as opcode instead of 0xEC.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If I revert this patch, reads are working fine.  
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can you try with the following patch?
> > >>>>  
> > >>>
> > >>> Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B
> > >>> mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes.  
> > > Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 mode read  
> > opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode.  
> > >>>  
> > >>
> > >> Can you try with this patch applied?
> > >>  
> > > With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly.
> > >
> > > 	[    1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80
> > > 	[    1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22)
> > > 	[    1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8)
> > > 	[    1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc)
> > > 	[    1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
> > >
> > > Without this patch, param_headers are getting freed and restoring previous  
> > erase map i.e. opcode related to 1-1-4 protocol.  
> > >  
> > 
> > Can you add some prints in spi_nor_parse_smpt() to isolate what's failing? We
> > should understand whether it's something wrong in spi_nor_parse_smpt() or the
> > s25fs512s smpt table does not respect the standard.
> >   
> 
> It's returning failure from below point in func spi_nor_get_map_in_use()
> 
>         /* Find the matching configuration map */
>         while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) {
>                 if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END) {
>                         printk("%d %s \n", __LINE__, __func__);
>                         goto out;
>                 }

Can you dump the smpt array just before calling
spi_nor_get_map_in_use()?

> --
> Regards
> Yogesh Gaur.
> 
> > Thanks,
> > ta
> >   
>