Re: [PATCH v2 02/22] clk: at91: generated: SSCs don't have a gclk

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Wed Oct 17 2018 - 13:49:45 EST

Next message: Stephen Boyd: "Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] clk: at91: h32mx: separate registration from DT parsing"
Previous message: Tim.Bird: "RE: [RFC v1 00/31] kunit: Introducing KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework"
In reply to: Alexandre Belloni: "[PATCH v2 02/22] clk: at91: generated: SSCs don't have a gclk"
Next in thread: Alexandre Belloni: "[PATCH v2 03/22] clk: at91: h32mx: separate registration from DT parsing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2018-10-16 07:21:40)
> As the SSCs don't have gclk, don't check for their ID to allow them to set
> the audio pll rate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

Next message: Stephen Boyd: "Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] clk: at91: h32mx: separate registration from DT parsing"
Previous message: Tim.Bird: "RE: [RFC v1 00/31] kunit: Introducing KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework"
In reply to: Alexandre Belloni: "[PATCH v2 02/22] clk: at91: generated: SSCs don't have a gclk"
Next in thread: Alexandre Belloni: "[PATCH v2 03/22] clk: at91: h32mx: separate registration from DT parsing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]