Re: [PATCH 15/15] power: supply: olpc_battery: Add OLPC XO 1.75 support

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Fri Oct 19 2018 - 09:55:39 EST


On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:24 PM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> The battery and the protocol are essentially the same as OLPC XO 1.5,
> but the responses from the EC are LSB first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c
> index dde9863e5c4a..2adf33b9f641 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct olpc_battery_data {
> struct power_supply *olpc_bat;
> char bat_serial[17];
> int new_proto;
> + int little_endian;
> };
>
> /*********************************************************************
> @@ -321,6 +322,14 @@ static int olpc_bat_get_voltage_max_design(union power_supply_propval *val)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static s16 ecword_to_cpu(struct olpc_battery_data *data, u16 ec_byte)

ec_byte is misleading name. It's a 16-bit word. and since we called in
I/O accessor it as word, you may do the similar here.

And why result is s16 and not u16?

> +{
> + if (data->little_endian)
> + return le16_to_cpu(ec_byte);
> + else
> + return be16_to_cpu(ec_byte);

> +
> /*********************************************************************
> * Battery properties
> *********************************************************************/
> @@ -393,7 +402,7 @@ static int olpc_bat_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - val->intval = (s16)be16_to_cpu(ec_word) * 9760L / 32;
> + val->intval = ecword_to_cpu(data, ec_word) * 9760L / 32;
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_AVG:
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW:
> @@ -401,7 +410,7 @@ static int olpc_bat_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - val->intval = (s16)be16_to_cpu(ec_word) * 15625L / 120;
> + val->intval = ecword_to_cpu(data, ec_word) * 15625L / 120;
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY:
> ret = olpc_ec_cmd(EC_BAT_SOC, NULL, 0, &ec_byte, 1);
> @@ -432,21 +441,21 @@ static int olpc_bat_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - val->intval = (s16)be16_to_cpu(ec_word) * 10 / 256;
> + val->intval = ecword_to_cpu(data, ec_word) * 10 / 256;
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_AMBIENT:
> ret = olpc_ec_cmd(EC_AMB_TEMP, NULL, 0, (void *)&ec_word, 2);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - val->intval = (int)be16_to_cpu(ec_word) * 10 / 256;
> + val->intval = (int)ecword_to_cpu(data, ec_word) * 10 / 256;
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_COUNTER:
> ret = olpc_ec_cmd(EC_BAT_ACR, NULL, 0, (void *)&ec_word, 2);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - val->intval = (s16)be16_to_cpu(ec_word) * 6250 / 15;
> + val->intval = ecword_to_cpu(data, ec_word) * 6250 / 15;
> break;
> case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SERIAL_NUMBER:
> ret = olpc_ec_cmd(EC_BAT_SERIAL, NULL, 0, (void *)&ser_buf, 8);
> @@ -626,6 +635,10 @@ static int olpc_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ecver[0] > 0x44) {
> /* XO 1 or 1.5 with a new EC firmware. */
> data->new_proto = 1;
> + } else if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "olpc,xo1.75-ec")) {
> + /* XO 1.75 */
> + data->new_proto = 1;
> + data->little_endian = 1;
> } else if (ecver[0] < 0x44) {
> /*
> * We've seen a number of EC protocol changes; this driver
> --
> 2.19.0
>


--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko