Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: intel: pinctrl-baytrail: simplify getting .driver_data

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:00:27PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
> 

Thanks!

I see only 3 out of 5 patches.

Since we are about to establish a separate tree as well as an additional record
in MAINTAINERS data base for Intel pinctrl driver, I ask you to resend only
Intel related stuff in a separate series.

> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Build tested only. buildbot is happy.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index 6d1a43c0c251..a1c2548123a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -1838,8 +1838,7 @@ static int byt_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int byt_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> -	struct byt_gpio *vg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct byt_gpio *vg = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < vg->soc_data->npins; i++) {
> @@ -1867,8 +1866,7 @@ static int byt_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  
>  static int byt_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> -	struct byt_gpio *vg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct byt_gpio *vg = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < vg->soc_data->npins; i++) {
> -- 
> 2.19.0
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko