Re: [PATCH] wireless: mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

On 7/6/18 2:29 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> You dropped the remark saying you didn't review them, but did you?
> 

I'll add it in v2.

>>  	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20:
>>  		if (!ht_cap->ht_supported)
>>  			return false;
>> +		/* else: fall through */
> 
> What's the point in else:?
> 
> We also don't necessarily write
> 
> if (!...)
>   return false;
> else
>   do_something();
> 
> but rather
> 
> if (!...)
>   return false;
> do_something().
> 
> I think I'd prefer without the "else:"
> 

Sure thing. I'll change this in v2.

I'll send v2 shortly.

Thanks for the feedback.
--
Gustavo