Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Tue Oct 23 2018 - 01:40:09 EST
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 04:47:33 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 5:22 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Cristian.Birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tudor Ambarus
> > <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; richard@xxxxxx; Mark Brown
> > <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx;
> > cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cyrille Pitchen
> > <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx>; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx;
> > dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI
> > NOR flash memories
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:46:55 +0000
> > Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 5:13 PM
> > > > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Cristian.Birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tudor Ambarus
> > > > <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; richard@xxxxxx; Mark Brown
> > > > <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > > cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > > computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform
> > > > SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:03:09 +0000
> > > > Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 4:23 PM
> > > > > > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>;
> > > > > > Cristian.Birsan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; richard@xxxxxx;
> > > > > > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > > nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > > cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > > Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > > > > computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to
> > > > > > non-uniform SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:46:27 +0200 Boris Brezillon
> > > > > > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:39:48 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur
> > > > > > > <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > Patch used
> > >
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > > @@ -2863,26 +2863,39 @@ static u8 spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(const struct
> > > spi_nor *nor, const u32 settings)
> >
> > > /* Determine if there are any optional Detection Command Descriptors */
> > > - while (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) {
> > > + for (i = 0; i< smpt_len; i++) {
> >
> > See, you should have i += 2 here, not i++.
>
> Ok
> >
> > > + if ((smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > read_data_mask = SMPT_CMD_READ_DATA(smpt[i]);
> > > nor->addr_width = spi_nor_smpt_addr_width(nor, smpt[i]);
> > > - nor->read_dummy = spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(nor, smpt[i]);
> > > + if (!nor->addr_width)
> > > + nor->addr_width = 3;
> > > +
> > > + nor->read_dummy = 8; //spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(nor,
> > > + smpt[i]);
> > > nor->read_opcode = SMPT_CMD_OPCODE(smpt[i]);
> > > + pr_info("smpt[%d]=[addr_width:%08x, read_dumy:%08x,
> > > + read_opcode:%08x]\n", i, nor->addr_width, nor->read_dummy,
> > > + nor->read_opcode);
> > > +
> > > addr = smpt[i + 1];
> > >
> > > err = spi_nor_read_raw(nor, addr, 1, &data_byte);
> >
> > And add a trace here to print data_byte and addr.
> >
> Logs:
> [ 1.625840] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80
> [ 1.631536] Start [addr_width:00000000, read_dumy:00000000, read_opcode:00000000]
> [ 1.639013] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[0]=08ff65fc
> [ 1.644317] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[1]=00000004
> [ 1.649621] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[2]=04ff65fc
> [ 1.654924] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[3]=00000002
> [ 1.660229] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[4]=02ff65fd
> [ 1.665532] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[5]=00000004
> [ 1.670836] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[6]=ff0201fe
> [ 1.676140] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[7]=00007ff1
> [ 1.681444] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[8]=00037ff4
> [ 1.686748] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[9]=03fbfff4
> [ 1.692052] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[10]=ff0203fe
> [ 1.697441] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[11]=03fbfff4
> [ 1.702830] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[12]=00037ff4
> [ 1.708220] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[13]=00007ff1
> [ 1.713608] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[14]=ff0005ff
> [ 1.718999] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2882 smpt[15]=03fffff4
> [ 1.724388] smpt[0]=[addr_width:00000003, read_dumy:00000008, read_opcode:00000065]
> [ 1.732050] smpt_read[1] addr[00000004], data_byte[00000000] err:00000000
> [ 1.738830] smpt[2]=[addr_width:00000003, read_dumy:00000008, read_opcode:00000065]
> [ 1.746491] smpt_read[3] addr[00000002], data_byte[00000002] err:00000000
> [ 1.753270] smpt[4]=[addr_width:00000003, read_dumy:00000008, read_opcode:00000065]
> [ 1.760930] smpt_read[5] addr[00000004], data_byte[00000000] err:00000000
Ok, so now the opcode and address are matching the values in the spec.
Can you check what's sent to the SPI controller side (in your
->exec_op() implementation), just to make sure the m25p80 propagates
the information correctly? When you do that, make sure you also print
the buswidth of each element (op->cmd.buswidth, op->addr.buswidth,
op->dummy.buswidth and op->data.buswidth).
Can you also print the read_data_mask value here.
Next thing you can do is read the CR2NV reg (using the RDAR command) and
check the RL (Read Latency) and AL (Address Length) values.
> [ 1.767710] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2915 map_id=0 smpt_len:16 i=:6
> [ 1.773794] End [addr_width:00000003, read_dumy:00000008, read_opcode:00000065] ReturnVal:00000000
> [ 1.781092] spi_nor_parse_smpt:3065
> [ 1.784573] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22)
> [ 1.790153] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
>
>
> Code:
> for (i = 0; i< smpt_len; i+=2) {
> if ((smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
> break;
>
> read_data_mask = SMPT_CMD_READ_DATA(smpt[i]);
> nor->addr_width = spi_nor_smpt_addr_width(nor, smpt[i]);
> if (!nor->addr_width)
> nor->addr_width = 3;
>
> nor->read_dummy = 8;
> nor->read_opcode = SMPT_CMD_OPCODE(smpt[i]);
> pr_info("smpt[%d]=[addr_width:%08x, read_dumy:%08x, read_opcode:%08x]\n", i, nor->addr_width, nor->read_dummy, nor->read_opcode);
>
> addr = smpt[i + 1];
>
> err = spi_nor_read_raw(nor, addr, 1, &data_byte);
> pr_info("smpt_read[%d] addr[%08x], data_byte[%08x] err:%08x\n", (i+1), addr, data_byte, err);
> if (err)
> goto out;
>
> /*
> * Build an index value that is used to select the Sector Map
> * Configuration that is currently in use.
> */
> map_id = map_id << 1 | !!(data_byte & read_data_mask);
> map_id_is_valid = true;
> }
>
> if (map_id_is_valid)
> pr_info("%s:%i map_id=%d smpt_len:%d i=:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__, map_id, smpt_len, i);
> else
> pr_info("%s:%i NO map_id\n", __func__, __LINE__);
>
> for (nmaps = 0; i< smpt_len; nmaps++) {
> if(!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) {
> i += 2;
> continue;
> }
>
> if(!map_id_is_valid) {
> if (nmaps) {
> ret = NULL;
> break;
> }
>
> ret = smpt+i;
> } else if (map_id == SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i])) {
> ret = smpt+i;
> break;
> }
>
> /* increment the table index to the next map */
> i += SMPT_MAP_REGION_COUNT(smpt[i]) + 1;
> }
>
> pr_info("End [addr_width:%08x, read_dumy:%08x, read_opcode:%08x] ReturnVal:%08x\n", nor->addr_width, nor->read_dummy, nor->read_opcode, ret);
>
> --
> Thanks
> Yogesh Gaur.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Boris