Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix compilation for !CONFIG_ACPI
From: Srinivas Pandruvada
Date: Tue Oct 23 2018 - 17:52:17 EST
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 21:54 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> While at it, add a few comments which config options #ifdef
> and #else statements refer to.
>
> Fixes: 86d333a8cc7f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add base_frequency
> attribute")
> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 49c0abf2d48f..9578312e43f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -386,16 +386,11 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int
> cpu)
> return cppc_perf.guaranteed_perf;
> }
>
> -#else
> +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */
> static void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio(int cpu)
> {
> }
> -
> -static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu)
> -{
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> -}
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */
>
> static void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy)
> {
> @@ -477,7 +472,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> acpi_processor_unregister_performance(policy->cpu);
> }
> -#else
> +#else /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> static inline void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(struct
> cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> }
> @@ -490,7 +485,14 @@ static inline bool
> intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server(void)
> {
> return false;
> }
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
> +static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu)
> +{
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */
>
> static inline void update_turbo_state(void)
> {