Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq

[Sricharan R]

Hi Niklas,

On 10/22/2018 9:00 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:39:03AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 10/18/2018 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12)
>>>> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote:
>>>>>> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>       Thanks !!. Can i take that as 
>>>>>           Tested-by: Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@xxxxxxxxx>  ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this patch series going to be resent?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're
>>> good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the
>>> registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would
>>> appreciate it.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry for the late response. Was away.
>> Only pending thing was separating out the binding documentation for the cpu-freq
>> driver and fixing the text in documentation.  That means, yes its fine to merge
>> the clk ones as you said. I will resend that. Also, will send a follow up series for clk_hw to
>> clk change as you mentioned separately.
> 
> Hello Sricharan,
> 
> Great to see that the clk parts has been marged to clk-next!
> 
> Are you also planning on sending out a new version of the cpufreq driver
> consolidation parts?
> 
   yeah right, will send a new version, sometime next week.

> I'm planning on extending your consilidated cpufreq driver with support
> for msm8916 (Cortex-A53), where I plan to read PVS/speedbin, in order to
> set opp_supported_hw(), and also register with cpufreq (since Viresh/Ulf
> suggested that we shouldn't register with cpufreq in the CPR power-domain
> driver).

   ok sure.

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation