Re: [PATCH v1] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop locking from tegra_powergate_is_powered()

[Jon Hunter]

On 24/10/2018 11:44, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 10/24/18 1:20 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 21/10/2018 19:36, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> This fixes splats like the one below if CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
>>> and machine (Tegra30) booted with SMP=n or all secondary CPU's are put
>>> offline. Locking isn't needed because it protects atomic operation.
>>>
>>> # echo 0 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[1-3]/online
>>>
>>> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:254
>>> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G         C        4.18.0-next-20180821-00180-gc3ebb6544e44-dirty #823
>>> Hardware name: NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree)
>>> [<c01134f4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010db2c>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
>>> [<c010db2c>] (show_stack) from [<c0bd0f3c>] (dump_stack+0x94/0xa8)
>>> [<c0bd0f3c>] (dump_stack) from [<c0151df8>] (___might_sleep+0x13c/0x174)
>>> [<c0151df8>] (___might_sleep) from [<c0151ea0>] (__might_sleep+0x70/0xa8)
>>> [<c0151ea0>] (__might_sleep) from [<c0bec2b8>] (mutex_lock+0x2c/0x70)
>>> [<c0bec2b8>] (mutex_lock) from [<c0589844>] (tegra_powergate_is_powered+0x44/0xa8)
>>> [<c0589844>] (tegra_powergate_is_powered) from [<c0581a60>] (tegra30_cpu_rail_off_ready+0x30/0x74)
>>> [<c0581a60>] (tegra30_cpu_rail_off_ready) from [<c0122244>] (tegra30_idle_lp2+0xa0/0x108)
>>> [<c0122244>] (tegra30_idle_lp2) from [<c0853438>] (cpuidle_enter_state+0x140/0x540)
>>> [<c0853438>] (cpuidle_enter_state) from [<c08538a4>] (cpuidle_enter+0x40/0x4c)
>>> [<c08538a4>] (cpuidle_enter) from [<c01595e0>] (call_cpuidle+0x30/0x48)
>>> [<c01595e0>] (call_cpuidle) from [<c01599f8>] (do_idle+0x238/0x28c)
>>> [<c01599f8>] (do_idle) from [<c0159d28>] (cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x2c)
>>> [<c0159d28>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c0be76c8>] (rest_init+0xd8/0xdc)
>>> [<c0be76c8>] (rest_init) from [<c1200f50>] (start_kernel+0x41c/0x430)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 2 --
>>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>> index 1fa840e3d930..1714cd818d69 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>>> @@ -543,9 +543,7 @@ int tegra_powergate_is_powered(unsigned int id)
>>>  	if (!tegra_powergate_is_valid(id))
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>> -	mutex_lock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
>>>  	status = tegra_powergate_state(id);
>>> -	mutex_unlock(&pmc->powergates_lock);
>>>  
>>>  	return status;
>>
>> Can we just ...
>>
>> 	return tegra_powergate_state(id);
> 
> We can, but it is not necessary. Feel free to adjust the code as you wish while applying ;) I deliberately left the 'status' variable because I think that makes code a bit more expressive.

Thierry, please feel free to add my ...

Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Personally I would drop the 'status' variable but up to you.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic