Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: socket.c validate sprstat_policy

From: Tomas Bortoli
Date: Sun Oct 28 2018 - 04:42:21 EST


On 10/28/18 5:17 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 5:54 AM Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It is possible to perform out-of-bound reads on
>> sctp_getsockopt_pr_streamstatus() and on
>> sctp_getsockopt_pr_assocstatus() by passing from userspace a
>> sprstat_policy that overflows the abandoned_sent/abandoned_unsent
>> fixed length arrays. The over-read data are directly copied/leaked
>> to userspace.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+5da0d0a72a9e7d791748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> net/sctp/socket.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> index fc0386e8ff23..14dce5d95817 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
>> @@ -7083,7 +7083,9 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt_pr_assocstatus(struct sock *sk, int len,
>> }
>>
>> policy = params.sprstat_policy;
>> - if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)))
>> + if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)) ||
>> + __SCTP_PR_INDEX(policy) > SCTP_PR_INDEX(MAX) ||
>> + __SCTP_PR_INDEX(policy) < 0)
>> goto out;
>>
>> asoc = sctp_id2assoc(sk, params.sprstat_assoc_id);
>> @@ -7142,7 +7144,9 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt_pr_streamstatus(struct sock *sk, int len,
>> }
>>
>> policy = params.sprstat_policy;
>> - if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)))
>> + if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)) ||
>> + __SCTP_PR_INDEX(policy) > SCTP_PR_INDEX(MAX) ||
>> + __SCTP_PR_INDEX(policy) < 0)
>> goto out;
> This is not the correct fix.
> See https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/27/136
>

Ack, good to know ty!