Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Cleanup load_balance() condition

[Valentin Schneider]

Hi,

On 26/09/2018 16:12, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> The alignment of the condition is off, clean that up.
> 
> Also, logical operators have lower precedence than bitwise/relational
> operators, so remove one layer of parentheses to make the condition a
> bit simpler to follow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 6bd142d..9cf93ba 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8783,9 +8783,9 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
>  
>  out_one_pinned:
>  	/* tune up the balancing interval */
> -	if (((env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED) &&
> -			sd->balance_interval < MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL) ||
> -			(sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval))
> +	if ((env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED &&
> +	     sd->balance_interval < MAX_PINNED_INTERVAL) ||
> +	    sd->balance_interval < sd->max_interval)
>  		sd->balance_interval *= 2;
>  
>  	ld_moved = 0;
> 

Is there anything else that should be done for these two patches?

Thanks,
Valentin