Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/virtio: add in-fences support for explicit synchronization

[Emil Velikov]

Hi Rob,

On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 19:38, Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> @@ -124,6 +127,22 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         if ((exbuf->flags & ~VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> +       if (exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN) {
> +               in_fence = sync_file_get_fence(in_fence_fd);
> +               if (!in_fence)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
> +               /*
> +                * Wait if the fence is from a foreign context, or if the fence
> +                * array contains any fence from a foreign context.
> +                */
> +               if (!dma_fence_match_context(in_fence, vgdev->fence_drv.context)) {
> +                       ret = dma_fence_wait(in_fence, true);
> +                       if (ret)
> +                               return ret;
Aren't we missing dma_fence_put() before the return here?

With that
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-Emil