[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 52/73] Drivers: hv: kvp: Fix two "this statement may fall through" warnings

From: Sasha Levin
Date: Wed Oct 31 2018 - 19:24:29 EST

From: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit fc62c3b1977d62e6374fd6e28d371bb42dfa5c9d ]

We don't need to call process_ib_ipinfo() if message->kvp_hdr.operation is
KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO in kvp_send_key(), because here we just need to pass on
the op code from the host to the userspace; when the userspace returns
the info requested by the host, we pass the info on to the host in
kvp_respond_to_host() -> process_ob_ipinfo(). BTW, the current buggy code
actually doesn't cause any harm, because only message->kvp_hdr.operation
is used by the userspace, in the case of KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO.

The patch also adds a missing "break;" in kvp_send_key(). BTW, the current
buggy code actually doesn't cause any harm, because in the case of
KVP_OP_SET, the unexpected fall-through corrupts
message->body.kvp_set.data.key_size, but that is not really used: see
the definition of struct hv_kvp_exchg_msg_value.

Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c b/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c
index 5eed1e7da15c..57715a0c8120 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c
@@ -353,7 +353,6 @@ static void process_ib_ipinfo(void *in_msg, void *out_msg, int op)

out->body.kvp_ip_val.dhcp_enabled = in->kvp_ip_val.dhcp_enabled;

- default:
utf16s_to_utf8s((wchar_t *)in->kvp_ip_val.adapter_id,
@@ -406,7 +405,7 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy)
process_ib_ipinfo(in_msg, message, KVP_OP_SET_IP_INFO);
- process_ib_ipinfo(in_msg, message, KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO);
+ /* We only need to pass on message->kvp_hdr.operation. */
case KVP_OP_SET:
switch (in_msg->body.kvp_set.data.value_type) {
@@ -446,6 +445,9 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy)

+ break;
case KVP_OP_GET:
message->body.kvp_set.data.key_size =