Re: [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation

[Nadav Amit]

From: Peter Zijlstra
Sent: October 31, 2018 at 9:08:35 AM GMT
> To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@xxxxxxxxx>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-integrity <linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-security-module <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, open list:DOCUMENTATION <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:18:39PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> Nadav, want to resubmit your series? IIRC the only thing wrong with it was
>>> that it was a big change and we wanted a simpler fix to backport. But
>>> thatâs all done now, and I, at least, rather liked your code. :)
>> 
>> I guess since it was based on your ideasâ
>> 
>> Anyhow, the only open issue that I have with v2 is Peterâs wish that I would
>> make kgdb use of poke_text() less disgusting. I still donât know exactly
>> how to deal with it.
>> 
>> Perhaps it (fixing kgdb) can be postponed? In that case I can just resend
>> v2.
> 
> Oh man, I completely forgot about kgdb :/
> 
> Also, would it be possible to entirely remove that kmap fallback path?

Let me see what I can do about it.