Re: [PATCH v2] raid6/ppc: Fix build for clang

[Nick Desaulniers]

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:45 PM Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We cannot build these files with clang as it does not allow altivec
> instructions in assembly when -msoft-float is passed.
>
> Jinsong Ji <jji@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We currently disable Altivec/VSX support when enabling soft-float.  So
> > any usage of vector builtins will break.
> >
> > Enable Altivec/VSX with soft-float may need quite some clean up work, so
> > I guess this is currently a limitation.
> >
> > Removing -msoft-float will make it work (and we are lucky that no
> > floating point instructions will be generated as well).
>
> This is a workaround until the issue is resolved in clang.
>
> Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31177
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/239
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: fix typo in comment, thanks Jinsong
>
>  lib/raid6/Makefile | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/raid6/Makefile b/lib/raid6/Makefile
> index 2f8b61dfd9b0..7ed43eaa02ef 100644
> --- a/lib/raid6/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/raid6/Makefile
> @@ -18,6 +18,21 @@ quiet_cmd_unroll = UNROLL  $@
>
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_ALTIVEC),y)
>  altivec_flags := -maltivec $(call cc-option,-mabi=altivec)
> +
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +# clang ppc port does not yet support -maltivec when -msoft-float is
> +# enabled. A future release of clang will resolve this
> +# https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31177
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_altivec1.o  += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_altivec2.o  += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_altivec4.o  += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_altivec8.o  += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_altivec8.o  += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_vpermxor1.o += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_vpermxor2.o += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_vpermxor4.o += -msoft-float
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_vpermxor8.o += -msoft-float
> +endif

Hi Joel, thanks for this patch!  My same thoughts about
CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG vs cc-option from
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2018-November/180939.html
apply here as well.  I don't feel strongly about either though.  What
are your thoughts?

>  endif
>
>  # The GCC option -ffreestanding is required in order to compile code containing
> --
> 2.19.1
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers