Re: [PATCH] Change the total_dirty from SZ_256M to SZ_64M.
From: Nikolay Borisov
Date: Sat Nov 03 2018 - 05:01:47 EST
On 3.11.18 Ð. 10:36 Ñ., hmsjwzb wrote:
> The SZ_256M will cause trouble in platform with less than 256M memory.
> For example, a qemu virtual machine.
>
> Signed-off-by: hmsjwzb <weizhefix@xxxxxxxxx>
If you have actually taken the care to understand the code in
test_find_delalloc you would have seen that total_dirty and max_bytes
are actually inter-dependent so you cannot really change total_bytes
without adjusting max_bytes as well. Otherwise tests will start breaking.
NACK on this (and likely any future postings of this) since the tests
are sized in a such a way so as to test design limits (such as the max
extent size which is 128MB)
> ---
> fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> index 9e0f4a01be14..cb23dce96a2d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize)
> struct page *page;
> struct page *locked_page = NULL;
> unsigned long index = 0;
> - u64 total_dirty = SZ_256M;
> + u64 total_dirty = SZ_64M;
> u64 max_bytes = SZ_128M;
> u64 start, end, test_start;
> u64 found;
>