Re: [PATCH 2/9] soc: samsung: add exynos chipid driver support
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Nov 16 2018 - 07:41:13 EST
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 16:12, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs and SoC
> revisions. This patch intends to provide initialization code for all
> these functionalities, at the same time it provides some sysfs entries
> for accessing these information to user-space.
>
> This driver uses existing binding for exynos-chipid.
>
> Changes by Bartlomiej:
> - fixed return values on errors
> - removed bogus kfree_const()
> - added missing Exynos4210 EVT0 id
> - converted code to use EXYNOS_MASK define
> - fixed np use after of_node_put()
> - fixed too early use of dev_info()
> - made driver fail for unknown SoC-s
> - added SPDX tag
> - updated Copyrights
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [m.szyprowski: for suggestion and code snippet of product_id_to_soc_id]
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 5 ++
> drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> index 2186285..2905f52 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ menuconfig SOC_SAMSUNG
>
> if SOC_SAMSUNG
>
> +config EXYNOS_CHIPID
> + bool "Exynos Chipid controller driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
> + select SOC_BUS
> +
> config EXYNOS_PMU
> bool "Exynos PMU controller driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || ((ARM || ARM64) && COMPILE_TEST)
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> index 29f294b..c2a8fbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_CHIPID) += exynos-chipid.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU) += exynos-pmu.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU_ARM_DRIVERS) += exynos3250-pmu.o exynos4-pmu.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5cb0188
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * http://www.samsung.com/
> + *
> + * EXYNOS - CHIP ID support
> + * Author: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
I think both platform headers are not used here.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK (0xF << 4)
> +#define EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK (0xF << 0)
> +#define EXYNOS_REV_MASK (EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK | EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK)
> +#define EXYNOS_MASK 0xFFFFF000
> +
> +static const struct exynos_soc_id {
> + const char *name;
> + unsigned int id;
> +} soc_ids[] = {
> + { "EXYNOS3250", 0xE3472000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4210", 0x43200000 }, /* EVT0 revision */
> + { "EXYNOS4210", 0x43210000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4212", 0x43220000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4412", 0xE4412000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5250", 0x43520000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5260", 0xE5260000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5410", 0xE5410000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5420", 0xE5420000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5440", 0xE5440000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5800", 0xE5422000 },
> + { "EXYNOS7420", 0xE7420000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5433", 0xE5433000 },
> +};
> +
> +static const char * __init product_id_to_soc_id(unsigned int product_id)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(soc_ids); i++)
> + if ((product_id & EXYNOS_MASK) == soc_ids[i].id)
> + return soc_ids[i].name;
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +int __init exynos_chipid_early_init(void)
> +{
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + void __iomem *exynos_chipid_base;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + struct device_node *root;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + u32 product_id;
> + u32 revision;
> +
> + /* look up for chipid node */
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-chipid");
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + exynos_chipid_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> + if (!exynos_chipid_base) {
> + pr_err("Failed to map SoC chipid\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + product_id = readl_relaxed(exynos_chipid_base);
> + revision = product_id & EXYNOS_REV_MASK;
> + iounmap(exynos_chipid_base);
> +
> + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->family = "Samsung Exynos";
> +
> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
> + of_node_put(root);
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%x", revision);
> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = product_id_to_soc_id(product_id);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr->soc_id) {
> + pr_err("Unknown SoC\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + /* please note that the actual registration will be deferred */
> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr);
> + return PTR_ERR(soc_dev);
> + }
> +
> + /* it is too early to use dev_info() here (soc_dev is NULL) */
> + pr_info("soc soc0: Exynos: CPU[%s] PRO_ID[0x%x] REV[0x%x] Detected\n",
> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id, product_id, revision);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_initcall(exynos_chipid_early_init);
> --
> 1.9.1
>