[PATCH 4.19 064/205] fuse: Fix use-after-free in fuse_dev_do_read()

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Nov 19 2018 - 11:33:42 EST


4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit bc78abbd55dd28e2287ec6d6502b842321a17c87 upstream.

We may pick freed req in this way:

[cpu0] [cpu1]
fuse_dev_do_read() fuse_dev_do_write()
list_move_tail(&req->list, ...); ...
spin_unlock(&fpq->lock); ...
... request_end(fc, req);
... fuse_put_request(fc, req);
if (test_bit(FR_INTERRUPTED, ...))
queue_interrupt(fiq, req);

Fix that by keeping req alive until we finish all manipulations.

Reported-by: syzbot+4e975615ca01f2277bdd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 46c34a348b0a ("fuse: no fc->lock for pqueue parts")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.2
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1311,12 +1311,14 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_do_read(struct f
goto out_end;
}
list_move_tail(&req->list, &fpq->processing);
+ __fuse_get_request(req);
spin_unlock(&fpq->lock);
set_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
/* matches barrier in request_wait_answer() */
smp_mb__after_atomic();
if (test_bit(FR_INTERRUPTED, &req->flags))
queue_interrupt(fiq, req);
+ fuse_put_request(fc, req);

return reqsize;