On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 01:35:57PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
On 11/18/18 2:23 AM, Priit Laes wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 09:31:35PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
On 11/14/18 12:27 PM, Priit Laes wrote:
Kernel library has a common cordic algorithm which is identical
to internally implementatd one, so use it and drop the duplicate
implementation.
My test setup has a hardware failure, thus I cannot test your patch, but I
now believe it to be correct. Thus your first and third patches may be
annotated with
ACKed-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
One thing that should be done is to fix the error in the b43 code for stable
as it was introduced in 2.6.34. I propose adding the attached patched to
your series placed between your current 2nd and 3rd patches so that the old
kernels get fixed. Of course, your 3rd patch will need to be revised. If all
4 of the patches get submitted together there will be no problems with the
timing. My change will exist for seconds in the mainline kernel, but it will
get propagated back through stable.
Thanks!
From b42ae73ef7505de93e4c66fb9f66930e3f3d969a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 13:15:07 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] b43: Fix error in cordic routine
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The cordic routine for calculating sines and cosines that was added in
commit 986504540306 ("b43: make cordic common (LP-PHY and N-PHY need it)")
contains an error whereby a quantity declared u32 can in fact go negative.
It seems to be different commit though:
commit 6f98e62a9 ("b43: update cordic code to match current specs")