Re: [PATCH v3] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
From: Alexey Brodkin
Date: Mon Nov 19 2018 - 17:10:51 EST
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 23:09 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 19/11/2018 22:53, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 22:50 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > On 19/11/2018 12:29, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > > It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
> > > > from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
> > > > by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
> > > >
> > > > Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
> > > > CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
> > > >
> > > > Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
> > > > counters.
> > > >
> > > > This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
> > > > That's what we used to have:
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > > >
> > > > Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > > >
> > > > 10.000000 task-clock (msec) # 2.832 CPUs utilized
> > > > 1 context-switches # 0.100 K/sec
> > > > 1 cpu-migrations # 0.100 K/sec
> > > > 63 page-faults # 0.006 M/sec
> > > > 3049480 cycles # 0.305 GHz
> > > > 1091259 instructions # 0.36 insn per cycle
> > > > 256828 branches # 25.683 M/sec
> > > > 27026 branch-misses # 10.52% of all branches
> > > >
> > > > 0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
> > > >
> > > > 0.000000000 seconds user
> > > > 0.010000000 seconds sys
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > >
> > > > And now we'll see:
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > > >
> > > > Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > > >
> > > > 3.004322 task-clock (msec) # 0.865 CPUs utilized
> > > > 1 context-switches # 0.333 K/sec
> > > > 1 cpu-migrations # 0.333 K/sec
> > > > 63 page-faults # 0.021 M/sec
> > > > 2986734 cycles # 0.994 GHz
> > > > 1087466 instructions # 0.36 insn per cycle
> > > > 255209 branches # 84.947 M/sec
> > > > 26002 branch-misses # 10.19% of all branches
> > > >
> > > > 0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
> > > >
> > > > 0.003519000 seconds user
> > > > 0.000000000 seconds sys
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
> > > > execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're runnign
> > > > @ 1GHz here).
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > Maybe a bit too late but I completely forgot to add stable tag into Cc list.
> > Any chance to add it still?
>
> Yes, no problem, I've added it.
Cool, thanks!
-Alexey