[PATCH 13/13] x86/vsyscall/64: Use X86_PF constants in the simulated #PF error code
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Mon Nov 19 2018 - 17:46:07 EST
Rather than hardcoding 6 with a comment, use the defined constants.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
index 85fd85d52ffd..d78bcc03e60e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static bool write_ok_or_segv(unsigned long ptr, size_t size)
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, (void __user *)ptr, size)) {
struct thread_struct *thread = ¤t->thread;
- thread->error_code = 6; /* user fault, no page, write */
+ thread->error_code = X86_PF_USER | X86_PF_WRITE;
thread->cr2 = ptr;
thread->trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
--
2.17.2