Re: [PATCH v8 06/13] arch/resctrl: Initialize the resource functions that are different

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Tue Nov 20 2018 - 04:59:29 EST


On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 08:54:32PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Initialize the resource functions that are different between the
> vendors. Some features are initialized differently between the vendors.
> Add _intel suffix to Intel specific functions.
>
> For example, MBA feature varies significantly between Intel and AMD.
> Separate the initialization of these resource functions. That way we
> can easily add AMD's functions later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h | 8 ++++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_ctrlmondata.c | 4 +--
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
> index 18c8222f326c..eeb7e0e4883e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ int max_name_width, max_data_width;
> bool rdt_alloc_capable;
>
> static void
> -mba_wrmsr(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m, struct rdt_resource *r);
> +mba_wrmsr_intel(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m,
> + struct rdt_resource *r);
> static void
> cat_wrmsr(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m, struct rdt_resource *r);
>
> @@ -171,10 +172,7 @@ struct rdt_resource rdt_resources_all[] = {
> .rid = RDT_RESOURCE_MBA,
> .name = "MB",
> .domains = domain_init(RDT_RESOURCE_MBA),
> - .msr_base = IA32_MBA_THRTL_BASE,
> - .msr_update = mba_wrmsr,
> .cache_level = 3,
> - .parse_ctrlval = parse_bw,
> .format_str = "%d=%*u",
> .fflags = RFTYPE_RES_MB,
> },
> @@ -356,7 +354,8 @@ u32 delay_bw_map(unsigned long bw, struct rdt_resource *r)
> }
>
> static void
> -mba_wrmsr(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m, struct rdt_resource *r)
> +mba_wrmsr_intel(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m,
> + struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> unsigned int i;
>
> @@ -873,6 +872,25 @@ static __init bool get_rdt_resources(void)
> return (rdt_mon_capable || rdt_alloc_capable);
> }
>
> +static __init void rdt_init_res_defs_intel(void)
> +{
> + struct rdt_resource *r;
> +
> + for_each_rdt_resource(r) {
> + if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA) {
> + r->msr_base = IA32_MBA_THRTL_BASE;
> + r->msr_update = mba_wrmsr_intel;
> + r->parse_ctrlval = parse_bw_intel;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static __init void rdt_init_res_defs(void)
> +{
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> + rdt_init_res_defs_intel();
> +}

So I'm wondering: instead of having mba_wrmsr_intel() and
mba_wrmsr_amd() and adding those per-vendor initialization functions,
why don't you push down the vendor differentiation into mba_wrmsr()?

Then in that function you do

if (vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
__mba_wrmsr_intel();
else if (vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
__mba_wrmsr_amd();

and so on and then you don't have to do any of that initialization dance
here and the struct rdt_resource assignment for the MBA will remain
nicely similar to the other ones...

Hmmm?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.